Influence of Auditors Scepticism on Audit Quality: Evidence from Audit Firms in Nigeria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33003/fujafr-2025.v3i3.210.90-100Keywords:
Alertness to Red Flags, Critical Evaluation of Evidence, Going Concern Opinion Issuance, Independence of Thought, Persistence, Questioning Mind setAbstract
The influence of auditors’ scepticism on audit quality has been a subject of debate regarding the robustness of audit procedure and appropriateness of audit reports on the financial statements of their clients. The study investigated the influence of auditors’ attitudes on audit quality. The aim is to examine the influence of auditors’ scepticism on audit quality. The study proxies audit scepticism using Questioning Mindset (QM), Alertness to Red Flags (ARF), Critical Evaluation of Evidence (CEE), Independence of Thought (IT) and Persistence (P) as independent variables, while audit quality is proxied by Going Concern Opinion Issuance (GCOI). Using an ex-post facto research design, data for the study were obtained via questionnaire administered to a sample of 690 respondents (115 each from six geopolitical zones of Nigeria) comprising auditors (partners, senior managers and audit trainees) from 30 audit firms (5 each from the geopolitical zones). The study adopted Partial Least Square Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) for analysing the data. Findings revealed insignificant influence of predictors on GCOI. The study recommends that audit firms in Nigeria should build cultures that encourage questioning, scepticism, and integrity over client satisfaction and strengthen client evaluation and acceptance processes to avoid high-risk or overly influential clients.
References
Amos, A.A, Ibukun, O.F & Fasilat, I.A (2024) Auditor independence and financial integrity in Nigeria: an analysis of challenges and implications. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Sciences 8(11), 411-426 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.8110035
Arsoff, B.N & Berth, D.I (2020) Professional scepticism in auditing: The myths and realities. Journal of Management, Accounting and Entrepreneurship Research 1(5), 427 -441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5171/2020.804680
Bansel, F.M &Gerto, H.I. (2019) Impact of professional scepticism on audit quality. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Business Research 2(2), 427-442.
Bassey, E.B, Omini, E.U, Aminu, O, Etore, U.A, & Archibong, S.E (2020). Auditor independence and audit quality in Nigeria. Journal of Critical Review, 7(17), 624-636. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.07.153
Burttle E.R & Krammer, N.O (2017) Auditors’ scepticism the vitality and bottlenecks. Journal of Accounting, Economics and Development Studies 2(3), 549-561.
Crasher, P.E & Allen, F.D (2018) Evaluation of audit evidence: A theoretical analysis of enabling factors. Journal of management, Accounting and Business Research Entrepreneurship Research 2(3), 231 -244.
Debo, O.B &Ganiyu, A.A (2025) Impact of cognitive biases of audits on audit outcome: an exploratory study. Journal of Accounting Management and Entrepreneurship research 1(4) 69-81.
Demola, A.W &Tokunbo, O.G (2024) Auditors objectivity and transparency reporting of business performance: A theoretical analysis of influencing factors in Nigeria. Journal of Accounting and Contemporary Management 2(1), 402-418.
Drerby, J.K & Collins, V.C (2018) Impact of behavioural and Psychological attitudes of auditor on audit quality. Journal of Auditing and Management Research 2(2), 404-416.
Evans, N.A & Cole, H.L (2021) Professional scepticism: Auditors involvement through reflective practice. Journal of Accounting Business and Economy Research, 1(3), 171-184.
Foord, P.S & Markteen, B.U. (2018) Ethical culture: A cornerstone of audit-quality and assurance. Journal of Contemporary Management and Business Strategy 2(1), 233-246.
Fornell, C &Larcker, D.F (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1), 39 -50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Fross, R.h&Neryer, M.A (2016) towards increased business stakeholders’ confidence: the role of audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Applied Management 1(6), 375-388.
Hair, J.F, Ringle, C.M &Sarstedt, M (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed, a silver bullet: Journal of Marketing theory and practice 19(2), 139-152 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
Hair, J.F, Hult, G.T, Ringle, C.M. & Sarstedt, M. (2017) A primer on partial least square structural equation modelling (indent) Thousand Oaks CA: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15358/9783800653614
Henseler, J, Ringle, C.M &Sarstedt, M (2015) A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modelling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 43 (1), 115-135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Heigh, T.A & Evan, E.E (2019) Audit expectations and confirmation of existing beliefs: The puzzles and consideration of alternating explanations. Journal of Auditing and Contemporary Business Research, 3(1) 426-438.
Jone, M.N &Nickson, RII (2016) Professional skepticism a reflection on how auditors make decisions. Journal of Accounting, Economic and Strategy Review 3(4),417-431.
Kantler, F.A. & Holves, T.P. 2024). Perseverance and auditors’ opinion on financial enterprises. Journal of Account, Entrepreneurship and Management 1(5), 216-229.
Knolker, B.I. & Worber (2016). Performance evaluation of business: The role of audit quality. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Management Research 2(3), 121-134.
Lambert C.U. & Bairham, I.D. (2023) Reliability and Sufficiency of audit evidence: the role of auditors’ scepticism. Journal of Accounting, Business and Development Research, 3(2), 231-252.
Lirtsel, T.W. & Mehrn Y.U. (2016). Corporation failures and transparency questions of financial reports. An overview. Journal of Business and Corporate Research 2(1), 140-154.
Morren, J. A. & Graham, F.D. (2017). Professional scepticism in auditing: the role of regulators. Auditing, Accounting and Management Review 1(3), 506-518.
Nour, K.K & Lee, M.I (2021) Scepticism in auditing profession: An analysis of the robustness of audit- procedure questions: Journal of Accounting, Economics and Entrepreneurship Studies 1(2), 273-287.
Odosu, O.B. & Moriola, O.O. (2025). Auditors persistence and audit-quality in Nigeria environment: a reflection on the problems and prospects. Journal of Accounting and Finance Management 1(3), 115- 127.
Okunwobi, P.F. & Nwokocha, N.I.N. (2025). Barriers to auditors’ independence in Nigerian Business environment. A theoretical investigation. Journal of Entrepreneurship Management and Accounting Research 1(3), 28-43.
Ortegerch, A. & Marcovich, V.T. (2024). Hindrances to sceptical attitude of auditors: An exploratory study. Journal of Finance, Business and Management Research, 2 (2), 196-210.
Parker, A.L & Sheen, E.N (2018). Audit failures and judgment lapses: How does professional scepticism matter 2. Journal of Accounting, Finance and Contemporary Management 1(2) 52-65.
Ryer, A.A. & prevan, H.I. (2016). Audit quality: Does professional scepticism matter? Journal of Auditing, Management and Finance Research 2(4), 361-374.
Sheth, C.O. & Zhanner, A.S. (2017). Impact of professional ethics and sceptical behaviour of auditors on audit quality. Journal of Auditing, Management and Social Sciences 3(1), 114 -126.
Surh, G.E. & Rursler R.R. (2016) Professional scepticism in auditing: are therefore contention and the standard? Journal of Contemporary Issues in Auditing, Accounting and Management 1(4), 109-122.
Theomartz, D.G. & Lionel, B.B. (2024). Inquisitiveness of attitude of auditors and quality of audit report. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Social Studies 4(1), 149-162.
Walter, V.V.B. & Zvertzir, W.Q. (2024). Audit quality: the role of auditors. Journal of Sustainability Management and Development 1(3), 379-393.
Williams, T.E. & Kane, M.M. (2017). Audit quality: the causes, sequences of decisions and communication. Accounting Management and Social Science Review 2(2), 174-188.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 FUDMA Journal of Accounting and Finance Research [FUJAFR]
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The FUDMA Journal of Accounting and Finance Research (FUJAFR) operates a copyright policy that ensures a balance between author rights and wide dissemination of scholarly work.
1. Author Copyright Retention
Authors retain full copyright of their published work without restriction. Submission to FUJAFR does not transfer ownership of copyright to the journal.
2. License to Publish
By submitting a manuscript and upon acceptance, authors grant FUJAFR:
- The right to publish, reproduce, and distribute the article
- The right to identify itself as the original publisher of the work
This grant is non-exclusive, meaning authors are free to reuse their work in other contexts, provided proper acknowledgment of the original publication in FUJAFR is made.
3. Licensing of Published Content
All articles are published under the:
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Under this license:
- Users may share and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes only
- Proper attribution to the author(s) and the journal is required
- Any commercial use requires explicit permission from the copyright holder
4. Author Reuse Rights
Authors are permitted to:
- Archive their published articles in institutional repositories or personal websites
- Share their work for educational and research purposes
- Reuse portions of their work in future publications (e.g., books or other articles), provided proper citation of the original publication is included
5. Third-Party Content
Authors are responsible for obtaining permission to use any third-party copyrighted material (e.g., images, tables, datasets) included in their manuscripts. Proper acknowledgment must be provided where required.
6. Attribution Requirement
All users of FUJAFR content must provide appropriate credit, including:
- Author name(s)
- Article title
- Journal name (FUJAFR)
- Year of publication
